|
| |
WHAT IS THE FAIR VALUE OF
THE DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE ("DJIA")?
This page (which draws on Warren
Buffett's teachings1) provides:
-
The Dow Jones Industrial Average P/E ratio (based
on trailing and forward earnings)
-
Earnings on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (GAAP,
operating and forward earnings)
-
Dividend Yield on the Dow Jones Industrial Average
-
A link to the P/E , earnings and dividend information on
the the Dow Jones web site
-
Calculations of the fair value of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average
based on several scenarios
Mathematically, the Fair Value of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average depends on the return that investors require, the growth in
earnings, and the probable P/E ratio at which it could be sold at the end of a reasonable holding period of
say 10 years.
This article provides a range of values depending on the scenario
chosen.
This analysis is dated May 29, 2010.
However the calculated fair value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is not affected by the
precise date of the analysis and our fair value estimates will not change
before the next set of quarterly earnings numbers becomes
available for the DJIA.
To be notified when we next update this
article, simply join the list for our (approximately) monthly free investment
newsletter. The sign-up box is at the bottom of every page on this site and on
the home page. If you don't find our newsletter valuable, every issue indicates
how to get off our list by simply using the "Get Off List" box on our home page.
A quick indication of whether or not the Dow Jones
Industrial Average is fairly valued is to look at its P/E ratio. At this time
the P/E ratio (based on actual reported earnings in the past year) of the DJIA index is
15.2. This is about neutral in attractiveness. Therefore the quick indication is that the DJIA index is
about fairly valued as May 29, 2010 at this time at 10,137.
This article explores the fair value of the DJIA in much more detail
below.
Importantly, an analysis of the fair value of the Dow Jones Industrial
Average (DJIA) will not provide a short-term indicator of market direction but
it should provide a rough indicator of the fair value of the DJIA and a long-term indicator of the expected return from investing in
the DJIA at this time.
The attractiveness of the current DJIA level can be judged by looking at the current
level of its earnings and dividends, forecasting a reasonable future rate
of earnings and dividend growth and by considering the minimum expected return required
by investors. Analysts often apply this valuation technique to
individual stocks. It is actually far easier to apply these calculations to a
stock index since an index constitutes a portfolio. A portfolio automatically eliminates
much (and usually most)
of the random noise of unexpected events at individual companies through diversification. Still,
many challenges remain in applying this analysis and therefore its results while providing
some indication for the long-term can offer no real insight for the short-term. A
broad index like the DJIA remains vulnerable to changes in interest rates and to uncertain growth
(or shrinkage) in the economy but is
usually largely insulated
from the numerous random events that can impact an individual stock.
What is the Earnings and P/E ratio of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average right now? (May 29, 2010 with the index at 10,137)
Data from the Dow Jones company
(For this update I could not find the data but I have since found it at this
link, the data below marked "not found" will be filled in for next
update)
| DJIA Earnings Type |
Annual Earnings on Dow Industrials |
P/E Ratio at 10,137 DOW |
Earnings Yield |
| Actual latest year (trailing four quarters) GAAP earnings |
$667 |
15.2 |
6.58% |
| Latest year operating earnings (removes negative
earnings) |
not found |
not found |
not found |
| Forecast forward GAAP earnings for the next year (next four
quarters) |
not found |
not found |
not found |
| Forecast forward operating earnings for the next year
(removes negative earnings) |
not found |
not found |
not found |
| For Comparison here are the DJIA earnings in prior
years: |
|
Historical GAAP P/E |
Historical Earnings Yield |
| 2009 Actual GAAP Earnings |
not found |
not found |
not found |
| 2008 Actual GAAP Earnings |
$661 |
13.3 |
7.52% |
| 2007 Actual GAAP Earnings |
$831 |
16.0 |
6.25 |
| 2006 Actual GAAP Earnings |
$720 |
17.3 |
5.78% |
| 2005 Actual GAAP Earnings |
$476 |
22.5 |
4.44% |
| 2004 Actual GAAP Earnings |
$592 |
18.2 |
5.49% |
In order to calculate a fair value of the Dow Jones
Industrial Average, it is necessary to start with its current earnings level and to
make sure that this current earnings level is "representative" of "normal"
expected economic conditions and has not been materially affected upwards or downwards by
usual items.
In our view a fair and perhaps conservative estimate of the "representative"
earnings level on the DJIA in the past year is the trailing earnings
of $667. This is well below the
actual earnings of 2007 and also somewhat below the actual earnings of 2006. 2007
and 2006 represented "top of the cycle" earnings and so a representative
earnings somewhat below those levels may be reasonable particularly given the
recession conditions.
This $667 is about 20% below the earnings from 2007 and 8%
below the 2006 earnings and therefore it does not seem unrealistically high at
all. Also it is about equal to the 2008 actual GAAP earnings which reflected a certain
amount of unusual losses.
The following graph provides additional insight into the
representative or normalized level of the DJIA earnings.

Note that we use a logarithmic scale on this chart.
Logarithmic shares should always be used when the time period is more than about
30 years because otherwise the lines will turn up exponentially.
The above chart shows that the earnings on the DOW trend up
with the U.S. GDP although at a slightly lower rate and with substantial
volatility around the trend.
The next chart presents the same data but starting in 1980
and using a regular arithmetic scale so that we can more closely examine the
graph over more recent years.

The last point on the chart is the earnings and GDP
in the 12 months ended Sept 2009. The earnings have dipped noticeably since
reaching a peak in 2007. The GDP figure is not yet showing a dip but is showing
a flat spot.
Note that the GDP figures here are in nominal dollars, whereas reports of recent
negative GDP growth refer to real, inflation adjusted dollars.
This chart shows that while GDP rose fairly steadily since
1980, the DOW earnings growth significantly lagged the GDP growth from 1980
bottoming with the recession in 1992. Thereafter the DOW earnings rose at about
the same rate as GDP or a bit higher before plunging after 2007. A best fit
trend line since 1980 would likely place the 2009 DOW earnings as low as about
$500 (which with a P/E of 15 would put the fair value of the DOW at (gulp) 7,500
and even with an 18 P/E it would only be 9,000). A best fit DOW earnings trend line
since 1992 would place the 2009 DOW earnings at about $700 (implying at a 15 P/E
a fair value DOW of 10,500 or at and 18 P/E, a fair value DOW of 12,600.)
The high DOW earnings in 2007 were clearly above the trend
line.
Our representative normalized earnings value of $667 being the trailing earnings with
is between our low and high estimates of $500 to $700 and
closer to the high end. This shows that our
normalized stating earnings level of $667 is not overly optimistic, nor overly
pessimistic, but appears to be a reasonable although perhaps moderately
optimistic estimate.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average represents a portfolio of 30 stocks. For each
$10,137 (the index value) purchased, the underlying companies in the portfolio
therefore,
on a representative or normalized basis, earned $667 in the past reported
four quarters and
currently pays a dividend of $10,137 * 0.0294 = $298
per year.
When we buy the Dow Jones Industrial Average index, we can therefore think of it as
being an investment or "stock" that (as of May 29, 2010) costs $10,137 and
currently earns $667 per year and pays a dividend of $298 per year. It is worth thinking
about whether or not this "stock" is a good investment at or around its recent
level of $10,137.
We know that the Dow Jones Industrial Average index was at
10,137 on May 29, 2010. We can estimate
what the DJIA "should" have been trading at based on the value of its
current earnings and
dividends and the projected growth in those earnings and dividends. This
intrinsic value approach calculates the present value of the projected earnings and dividends for a ten
year period and assuming that the index is sold at a projected future P/E.
In addition to the beginning earnings and dividend level,
three additional factors are required to calculate the fair value at which the DJIA should
be trading at. These are, 1. The forecast average annual growth rate in
earnings and dividends over the next (say) ten years. 2. The forecast P/E ratio at
which the DJIA index will be trading in ten years time (an assumed ten year
holding period for analysis purposes). 3. The estimated minimum expected rate of
return required by investors. (This required return is used to discount values
to today's present value).
Warren Buffett has argued that over the longer term, the
Dow Jones Industrial Average portfolio average earnings should grow at a rate
close to the growth rate of the U.S. economy in nominal (after inflation) terms.
I believe a prudent estimate for this growth rate is normally 4% to 6% and
I would normally focus on 5%. This 5%
can also be thought of as 3% real GDP growth and 2% for inflation).
Currently there is a lot of uncertainty as to both expected real GDP
growth and the inflation level. Some expect deflation while others expect
inflations. Overall a 5% earnings growth
assumption does not seem unreasonable but is certainly subject to much
uncertainty..
The average P/E for the Dow Jones Industrial average since
1929 has been 15.5 (Uses year-end data and excludes years when the P/E was
abnormally high due
to near-zero earnings and not due to optimism (1933 P/E 47.3, 1982 P/E 114.4,
and 1991 P/E 64.3 are all excluded as outliers). However the Justifiable
P/E changes with earnings expectations and the market's required return on
equities. I have conservatively calculated that the current Justifiable P/E is in the range
of only 12.5 to 14.3, even with today's low interest rates. This
conservative calculation of the justifiable P/E assumes that, on average, the
DOW companies will only earn, on new investments, the 7 to 8% minimum ROEs
required by investors in today's low-interest rate environment. The more optimistic we are
about the level of the P/E in ten years time, the higher is the justifiable fair
value level of the DJIA index today. Possibly proprietary technology,
scale advantages and brand loyalty may allow corporations to earn ROEs somewhat
above the minimum required by investors and this would justify somewhat higher
P/E ratios.
When I first calculated, in 2002, that the sustainable P/E ratio for
a broad stock index was about 12.5 to 14.3 the figure seemed impossibly
low given that the market index P/Es were well over 20 at that time. But given
that
the Dow Jones Industrial Average at the end of 2008 was 13.3 times trailing earnings, my
earlier calculation of the
sustainable P/E now looks quite plausible indeed.
I would estimate that a minimum
(pre-tax) return required by stock investors, on a broad portfolio of stocks, is in the range of no more than 7% to 9%. The
higher return required by investors then the lower the price or level that investors
should be willing to pay for the index today, all else being equal.
The following table calculates the value that the Dow Jones
Industrial Average will be at in ten years given various forecasts for the earnings
growth and given various scenarios for the forecast P/E ratio that will apply at
that time. The last column of the table then shows the fair or present value
that we should be willing to pay today for the cash flows that would result from
receiving each of the ten years of dividends plus the assumed cash from selling the index in ten years
time (at the amount in the column titled "Resulting DJIA in 10 years"). The cash
flows are converted to a "present value" calculated using the amount in
the "Required Return" column. The present value is calculated based on various scenarios (as shown) for the
required return or discount rate applied to each earnings growth and ending P/E
scenario.
| Earn |
Div |
Growth |
Terminal P/E |
Resulting
DJIA in 10 years |
Return |
DJIA
Fair Value Today |
Implied
Fair P/E today |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
13 |
12,835 |
7% |
9,082 |
13.6 |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
15 |
14,810 |
7% |
10,086 |
15.1 |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
17 |
16,784 |
7% |
11,089 |
16.6 |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
13 |
12,835 |
9% |
7,744 |
11.6 |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
15 |
14,810 |
9% |
8,579 |
12.9 |
| 667 |
298 |
4% |
17 |
16,784 |
9% |
9,413 |
14.1 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
13 |
14,124 |
7% |
9,870 |
14.8 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
15 |
16,297 |
7% |
10,975 |
16.5 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
17 |
18,470 |
7% |
12,079 |
18.1 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
13 |
14,124 |
9% |
8,406 |
12.6 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
15 |
16,297 |
9% |
9,324 |
14.0 |
| 667 |
298 |
5% |
17 |
18,470 |
9% |
10,242 |
15.4 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
13 |
15,528 |
7% |
10,725 |
16.1 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
15 |
17,917 |
7% |
11,939 |
17.9 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
17 |
20,306 |
7% |
13,154 |
19.7 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
13 |
15,528 |
9% |
9,124 |
13.7 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
15 |
17,917 |
9% |
10,133 |
15.2 |
| 667 |
298 |
6% |
17 |
20,306 |
9% |
11,142 |
16.7 |
Conclusions
By changing the expected earnings growth rate, the return
required by the investor and the assumed P/E ratio that will apply in ten years I can calculate
that today's DJIA index should be anywhere from 7,744 to 13,154. A
reasonable scenario may be the highlighted row with 5% earnings growth per year,
a 7% required rate of return and a final P/E ratio of 15 in ten years and a fair
DOW level of 10,975. However,
other scenarios are certainly plausible as well.
(Note however that all estimates assume $667 as the current
representative normalized earnings on the DOW. If that number is too high then
our results are optimistic and vice versa).
Since the Dow Jones Industrial Average is currently
about 10,137, I conclude that it is likely about fairly valued. (The point
estimate of this would be 8% under-valued, although the calculation
should not be considered to be at all precise).
The table illustrates quite a wide range for a reasonable
fair value of the DJIA.
Most investors would probably not admit to being happy with a
7% expected long-term return from stocks, but is
arguably quite attractive compared to a current 10 year U.S. government bond yield
of about 3.3%. By that measure, even an expected 6% nominal return from
stocks looks attractive compared to the 10-year bond yield.
Note also that the Price to book ratio of the Dow Jones Industrial Average is
(sorry, we could not find this figure at this time). The DJIA
companies have achieved a return on ending equity of about XX% in the past 12
months ROE = P/B/(P/E).
The overall conclusion is that at its current level (as
of May 29, 2010) of 10,137 the Dow Jones Industrial Average
is about fairly valued to slightly under-valued.
It is impossible to predict where the DJIA will go in the
next year. But it is relatively easy to calculate whether or not it is currently
significantly under- or over-valued based on reasonable growth expectations and a reasonable projection
for the P/E ratio and a reasonable assessment of investor's minimum required
rate of return. Caution is warranted
because the DJIA can sometimes spend years in an over-valued or an under-valued-state. But
ultimately, as we saw in the early 2000's, and in 2008 valuation does correct itself.
Readers can also see our similar
analysis of the S&P 500
index and of the Toronto Stock Exchange Index
Shawn C. Allen, CFA, CMA, MBA, P.Eng.
President, InvestorsFriend inc.
Last updated May 29, 2010
This is an update of an analysis I first did of the
DJIA dated February 8, 2002As
of May 29, 2010, the DOW has significantly under performed compared to what
was expected in early 2002. The good news is that a period of under-performance
will ultimately at some point be followed by a period of over-performance.
Keep in mind that with the past analysis we also provided a range of
valuations and readers were free to select a different fair valuation from our
table above.
| Date |
DJIA Level |
Fair Value we Calculated |
Apparent Performance as of May 2010 with Index at 10,137 |
| October 11, 2009 |
9,865 |
11,026 |
It's very early going but the DJIA has moved in the
indicated direction (higher) |
| April 4, 2009 |
8,018 |
9,146 |
It appears we were correct, the index was under-valued
on April 4, 2009 |
| Dec 6, 2008 |
8,635 |
10,317 |
It now appears we were moderately
optimistic. Earnings were at $752 based on an average of GAAP and operating
and have not grown. |
| Nov 6, 2008 |
8,696 |
10,506 |
It now appears we were moderately optimistic. Earnings
were at $690 and have not grown. |
| June 8, 2008 |
12,182 |
12,931 |
We now appear too optimistic as the $803 earnings from
June 2008 have declined instead of grown. In hindsight, we should have
considered whether earnings were above the trend line. The trend line was
not part of the analysis at that time. |
| Sep 8, 2007 |
13,113 |
13,214 |
We were too optimistic as we did not project a sharp
earnings decline. |
| Sept 15, 2006 |
12,446 |
12,009 |
We were too optimistic,
the earnings, then at $720 did not grow as expected. |
| May 31, 2005 |
10,467 |
10,912 |
We were too optimistic,
the earnings, then at $661 did not grow as expected. |
| Nov 30, 2004 |
10,428 |
10,716 |
We were too optimistic,
the earnings did not grow as expected. |
| Feb 8, 2002 |
9744 |
9,820 |
In hind-sight we were way too optimistic. Earnings,
then at $485 did not grow at the then expected 7% and our assumed terminal
P/E at 18 now seems too high. But we did recognize that our fair value of
9,820 in 2002 might be too high and we stated at that time:
Investors should be sobered by the fact that if investors require a 9%
rate of return and if the earnings only grow at 5% (say 3% GDP plus 2%
inflation) and if the DOW commands a P/E of only 15 in ten years then the
fair value of the DOW is calculated as only 5898. So conservative but not
really gloomy forecasts of earnings, required return level, and P/E result
in a fair value of the DOW at only 5898. Gulp! |
1. See Warren
Buffett in Fortune Magazine, November 22, 1999, and
his updated article of December 10, 2001.
|