InvestorsFriend Inc. Newsletter
October 6, 2006
Performance
I'm spending my Friday night typing out this newsletter. And yet I am in
a great mood! Why is that? It's because I am on track to make an
excellent return in stocks once again this year and to beat the market
average return for the seventh straight year. (On average my returns have
beaten the Canadian market index by about 12% per year while our Strong Buys
have beaten it by 20% per year). Also I have the great satisfaction of knowing that the several hundred
subscribers to our well-researched Stock Picks service have had the opportunity to make the same
excellent returns.
Just today we saw our Tim Hortons pick jump
another 4.5%. And some of our
subscribers in effect got their Tim Hortons shares for free (more about that
below).
The performance
of our Stock Picks on this Site continues to be very good. Since our
inception, seven years ago, our performance has been outstanding.
My personal portfolio is up 13% for 2006
to date. While that's lower than the blistering returns I achieved in each of the past three
years, it is still a very good return. Also, because my personal return has
averaged over 28% per year for the past four years, my portfolio has grown
to the point where a 13% gain in 2006 is a "noticeable" amount in dollars.
(i.e. Enough to put me in a good mood!)
Back to the Basics
It's my firm belief that in any field of
endeavor it's always a good idea to review the basics periodically. Recently
I have been thinking about what kind of stocks are likely to deliver a
strong return, based on basic mathematical facts.
My basic goal is to identify stocks that can
reasonably be expected to go up in price and give me (and our paid subscribers) a good return on
investment.
As further explained below, basic finance
suggests that we can achieve good investment returns by selecting stocks of
companies that are earning (and are expected to continue to earn) high
returns on their operations and to further select from these only those that are
available at a lower ratio of price to earnings.
To achieve any goal it usually helps to break
things down into smaller steps.
If a stock goes up in price we can break the
reason for that down into two categories:
1. It went up because its
(past 12 months) earnings per share went up, or
2. It went up because its
price to (past 12 months) earnings ratio (P/E ratio) went up.
There are many other ways to categorize
the reasons for a stock's price to rise, but if any
stock's price has risen it can be explained by a combination of the two
basic reasons above.
This then leads to the very basic conclusion that
to make money in stocks we should buy stocks which (ideally) can pass both of the
following tests:
1. We expect the earnings per share to rise at
an acceptable rate, and
2. We expect the P/E ratio to rise.
Sometimes it will not be realistic to expect to
find stocks that pass both tests. For example if we expect a stock
will increase its earnings per share by 20% per year for several years then
it will still be a great investment even if its P/E ratio remains the same or
falls somewhat.
We should generally avoid stocks where the P/E
ratio can be expected to fall materially. In general stocks with very a high
P/E ratio are in higher danger of suffering a major decline in this ratio.
Logically the best way to avoid investing in stocks where the P/E ratio may
fall materially is to focus on investing in lower P/E ratio stocks.
In general we should expect that (on average) companies that
have a record of poor earnings per share growth are going to continue to
have that record. Meanwhile, it is a reasonable bet to assume that (on
average) companies
with a long history of strong annual growth in earnings per share are likely
going to continue to grow their earnings per share. Companies with a high
return on equity are also likely to grow their earnings per share. It is a
mathematical fact that if a company keeps on earning 15% on equity and
retains the earnings then its earnings per share are going to have to grow
at 15% to keep the return on equity at 15%.
So it is a basic fact that to earn high returns
on stocks it makes sense to focus on companies with high recent historic
growth in earnings per share, a high ROE, and a reasonable to lower P/E ratio
(Preferably under 15).
Buying stocks with a high return on equity also
makes basic sense from another perspective. If you want to buy and hold a
stock and if you hope to make say 15% annually on that stock, then it makes
basic sense that the underlying company should itself be earning 15% on its
own equity.
If we were investing our money in a bank account
it would be immediately apparent that a higher interest rate on our money
would lead to a higher return for us. We can think of the interest rate as
being our return on our equity invested in the bank account. Similarly it is
logical that a company that can continue to make a higher return on its
equity is more likely to deliver a high return to investors, all else being
equal.
In conclusion a review of basic investing math
suggests that we should look for stocks with high ROEs (and that are
expected to be able to maintain that high ROE) and that are selling for
lower or at least reasonable P/E ratios. Stocks with consistently high past ROEs will invariably
display either strong historical increases in earnings per share or a high
dividend pay-out ratio.
Paradoxes of the Market
There are many paradoxes or contradictions in
logic when it comes to investing.
One of the biggest problems is that we have a
human tendency to expect recent trends to continue.
For example if the market goes up say 15% per
year for three straight years or more, then a part of our mind will
definitely
be telling us to expect another 15% the next year. In early 2000's investors
had seen the market soar for quite a few years. Investors could not help but
be optimistic and yet (paradoxically) it was actually predictable that the market could not keep
going up at a high pace. In fact it was predictable that returns would soon be
lower to make up for the fact that they had gotten so high. In affect there
is a "law of averages" or reversion to the mean (long-run average) that
applies.
Similarly if the market declines 15% per year for for several years then a
part of our mind cannot help but feel pessimistic about the future.
Consider late 2002, the market had crashed hard for two years. Investors
could not help being pessimistic just at a time when (in hind-sight) great
optimism was called for.
In the last four years Canadians have seen four
years in a row of strong market returns. Therefore our natural tendency is
to feel optimistic but in reality these higher recent past returns actually signal
lower average stock market returns ahead.
There is another common paradox in the market.
It is generally agreed that in total, corporate earnings cannot sustainably
grow at a faster rate than the economy. And few people would predict the
economy to grow faster than 5 to 6%. (Say 3 to 4% real GDP growth and 2% for
inflation). This would suggest that the earnings on a broad stock market
index should not be expected to grow any faster than 5 to 6% per year. And
if we consider that we have been in a period of unusually high corporate profits and
that we may be heading into a recession, it then becomes problematic to
predict that earnings on a broad stock market index can grow at even 5% on
average in say the next five years.
And yet when looking at any individual stock it
is rare to see the earnings projection for that individual company to be much
under 10%, let alone 5%. Apparently analysts expect almost every company to
grow at a rate that is much higher than the average sustainable rate.
For example, figures on the Dow Jones Industrial
Average Site indicate that on average analysts expect the earnings of the 30
Dow industrial stocks to grow at 15% in the next year. (Trailing P/E
excluding negative earnings is 16.44, forward P/E is listed at 13.92, which
implies an average 15.3% earnings growth). That is built up from earnings projections
for the individual stocks. And frankly, it looks like a laughably optimistic
scenario.
In the past few years such optimistic
projections have tended to come true. But it is a certainty that
such unsustainable earnings growth cannot continue indefinitely.
When projecting the earnings growth for any
individual company it is wise to keep in mind that an average company is
going to have trouble growing much faster than the economy or about 5%.
Luckily there will always be some individual
companies that can be expected to continue to grow earnings at high rates. On this Site, we
look for those exceptional companies.
Interest Rates and the Direction of Stock Prices
When long-term interest rates go down, stocks should go up (all else being
equal).
Recently long-term interest rates have been going down again. This,
in isolation, could be a positive indicator for stocks. But remember there
are other factors that are negative for stocks at this time.
The easiest way to understand why lower long-term interest rates tend to
drive stock prices up is to first understand how interest rates affect
bonds.
Most investors may be aware that an investment in a long term bond will
result in a capital loss if interest rates rise and a capital gain if interest
rates fall. If a 30-year government bond issued in 2005 pays 5% interest
then that is $50 per year per $1000 of face value. If interest rates then
fall to 4% in 2006 then the new 30-year $1000 government bond will only pay
$40 per year. The older bond that was purchased for $1000 when it was issued
is now worth about $1250 because $50 / $1250 is equal to 4%. The older
long-term bond gained 25% when interest rates dropped.
The same math affects stocks because stocks are
also expected to pay a
stream of dividends in the future or are expected to reinvest the money that
could have been paid as a dividend. However, the impact of interest rates on stocks is
often obscured by all the factors that can affect the expected earnings and
dividends that a stock might pay.
Overall, higher interest rates are like a gravitational force on the value
of both bonds and stocks. Lower interest rates are like a weakening of gravity
that allows bonds and stocks to float up in value.
With that background it is useful to look at how interest rates have moved
lately.
| |
10-Year Government of Canada bond interest rates
|
| October 4, 2006 |
3.96% |
| June 28, 2006 |
4.63% |
| August 31, 2005 |
3.78% |
| July 2004 |
4.82% |
| July 2003 |
4.78% |
| July 2002 |
5.23% |
Short-term interest rates have generally been rising steadily in Canada. The Bank of Canada overnight rate target rose from
from 2.0% in July
2004 to a current 4.25%.
Meanwhile (and less well known) long-term interest rates continued to move
lower well after July 2004. They briefly hit a bottom of about 3.8% in late August
2005. Since then the 10-year interest rate has been volatile. It
briefly rose as high as 4.63% in June 2006. (Remember the stock market
decline around then?) But since then 10-year interest rates
have slid all the way back to just under 4.0% in recent days.
In part, it has been this most recent slide in long-term interest rates that
has propelled stocks (other than resource stocks) up in recent months.
At this time most predictions are that long-term interest rates will stay
low for the next year or so. In isolation this should help stocks.
However, if part of the reason that interest rates are low is because we are
headed into recession then that factor could drive stocks down
significantly.
Overall, although interest rates are low, I am cautious on the direction
of markets. Canada has seen strong markets almost steadily since late 2002.
It would not be surprising if the market retraced some of that gain. Also
profits of many Canadian companies have been hurt by higher energy prices
and more particularly by our higher dollar.
I consider energy and resource stocks to be highly
unpredictable and I have
no opinion on where these are going.
My strategy has been to build up my cash weighting to be ready in case the
market falls. Meanwhile I still maintain quite a high weighting in stocks and for
these I focus on individual stocks that I think will do well based on profit
growth.
How Some of Our Subscribers got "free" Tim
Hortons Shares
In the fall of 2004 we rated Wendy's a Strong
Buy at prices as low as U.S. $33 to $31. Our investment "thesis" was that
the value of Tim Hortons was not being recognized in that price. In fact we
observed then that the 2500 Tim Hortons stores were contributing about 50%
of Wendy's total profits even though there were some 6500 Wendy's
restaurants. And we observed that American stock analysts focused on the
(low growth) same store sales of the Wendy's restaurants and pretty much
ignored the (high growth but unfamiliar) Tim Hortons part of the company.
Now, two years later, those who bought Wendy's
and hung onto it now still own the Wendy's. Last week Wendy's was at
U.S.$67. Wendy's then gave out 1.35 shares of Tim Hortons for each Wendy's
share. The Wendy's shares then declined since they no longer own Tim
Hortons. So those late 2004 investors may still own the Wendy's which at $33.80 is worth
about what they paid for it. Meanwhile, for each Wendy's share they own, they just received "free" 1.35 shares
of Tim Hortons which today are worth 1.35 times U.S. $27.75 or U.S. $37.46. So this
was over a 100% gain in two years on what appeared to me a lower risk
investment.
And last Spring when the financial media
was reporting that retail investors could not get any Tim Hortons Shares at its
IPO, our subscribers were fully aware that they could simply buy Wendy's
shares and then wait for the Tim Hortons shares to be handed out to them.
This was no secret but the financial press focused on the more interesting
story of the shortage of Tim Horton IPO shares.
Subscribe
For those on our mailing list for this free
newsletter, who are not already subscribers to our Stock Picks service,
there is never any pressure to subscribe to the paid service. We realize
that not everyone has funds to invest and not everyone has a self-directed
investment account. Some visitors to this Site have subscribed to the paid
service the same day they first visited this site. Others may wait a year or
more before deciding to access the Stock Picks.
But, if you are looking for stocks to invest in then
why not subscribe now? Remember the cost is just
CAN $11 per month or $99 per year. When you think about the potential
returns from just one well-researched Stock Pick, you can see why our
subscription service has been a great investment for our subscribers.
END
Shawn Allen, President
InvestorsFriend Inc.
To see older editions of this newsletter, or to
get off of this email list , click here.
