| Canadian National Railway Company (CNR, Toronto CNI, New York) |
| RESEARCH
SUMMARY |
| Report Author(s): |
InvestorsFriend Inc.
Analyst(s) |
| Author(s)' disclosure of share ownership: |
Author(s) hold
shares |
| Based on financials from: |
Dec '07 Y.E. |
| Last updated: |
2-Feb-07 |
| Share Price At Date of Last Update: |
$51.86 |
| Currency: |
$ Canadian |
| Generic Rating (This rating does not consider the circumstances
of any individual investor and is therefore not a recommendation and is not
Investment Advice ): |
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE ONLY AND IS NOW OUT
OF DATE (lower) Buy rated at $51.86 |
| DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS: Railroad, operating coast to coast in
Canada and includes Illinois Central Railway which extends the reach south to
the Gulf of Mexico. |
| SUMMARY AND RATING: The
graph illustrates that this is a "great company" with strong
(adjusted) earnings per share growth. ROE is very strong and overall the
value ratios indicate a Buy. This management seems to be very aggressively
focused on growth in shareholder value. Arguably passes all of the Buffett
tenets. Very recent earnings growth
has stalled to about 0%. The near-term outlook is for flat to slightly lower
earnings due to the high Canadian dollar and lower forestry volumes and
possible U.S. recession. Growth should resume after 2008. Significant share buy backs add support to
the price. Overall we rate it a (lower) Buy due to the strong management, the
earnings history, the reasonable P/E and the long-term sustainable advantage
of owning tracks that likely cannot be duplicated by competitors, and the
current value premiums being paid for cash generating assets, this is offset
by a relatively poor outlook for the
next year. |
| RISKS: The company notes environmental and casualty liability
risks. Also labour trouble is a large risk . Rising pension costs. Some
regulatory and environmental risks. See annual report for more risks. |
| INSIDER TRADING / INSIDER HOLDING: Checking insider trading from
July 1, 2007 to December 10, 2007.
About 7 insider exercised options and sold shares but generally
continued to hold many shares so this is not considered more than a very
modestly negative signal. 1 insider sold 400 shares at $54. One insider
exercised options but held most of the shares and then bought 1000 when it
dipped to $46. The CEO bought 21,000 shares at about $47. One director bought
shares at $57 and $51. The company itself is buying back lots of shares but
we take no signal from that - after all they are using shareholder money to
do that. Updating from Dec 11 to Feb
1, several insider exercised options and sold around $50. Subsequent to the
recent earnings release 1 insider exercised options and sold at $48.55.
Overall, the insider trading / insider holding signal seems about neutral at
a $52 share price. |
| WARREN BUFFETT's TENETS: Arguably passes all of Buffett's tenets
(see Robert Hagstrom's book) - simple to understand (pass), good profit
history (pass), reasonably favourable prospects due to strong management and
low costs (pass), rational-candid-ethical management (pass), high ROE (pass),
high profits on sales (pass), a reasonably low debt ratio (pass) and arguably
selling at a reasonable discount to intrinsic value (marginal pass). |
| MOST RECENT EARNINGS AND SALES TREND: Adjusted Earnings per share were unchanged
in 2007 versus 2006. In Q1 2007
earnings per share dropped 5% due to disruptions of service caused by weather
problems and labour problems. In Q2
2007 adjusted EPS roses 7%. In Q3 2007 adjusted EPS declined by 1%. In Q4
adjusted EPS were the same as Q4 2006. Therefore the trend had been very
strong but it appears that earnings growth has now stalled. Earnings per
share growth has gone to 0% due to the higher Canadian dollar and due to much
lower shipments of forestry products to the U.S. - caused by the housing
recession there. |
| VALUE RATIOS: Analysed at $51.86. Price to book value ratio at
2.5 is neutral in attractiveness and mathematically reflects the high ROE and
modest P/E. Price to book would be lower (more attractive) at about 1.7 if
deferred taxes were removed or fully discounted as a liability. The P/E
(adjusted to remove unusual gains) is 15.3 which seems somewhat attractive.
Dividend yield is modest at 1.8%, but the dividend has been increasing
substantially. Return On Equity (adjusted to remove gains) was quite strong
at 17.2%. Sales per share have grown at an average 9.1% in the past 5 years.
Adjusted EPS growth over 5 years has averaged a very strong 14.5% but was 0%
in 2007. As detailed below, we calculate the intrinsic value to be $53.09 to
$64.41, assuming five-year growth of 7% to (a perhaps quite optimistic) 10%
and a P/E in five years of 15 to 16 respectively. This indicates an estimated Price to Value
ratio of between 98% and 81% respectively.
In order to return 15% annually over 5 years (to shareholders buying
now at $51.86) growth would need to average 11.9% assuming a P/E of 16, such
growth is quite optimistic. Overall these ratios, in isolation, indicate a Buy rating assuming growth of at
least 7%. |
| SUPPORTING RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS |
| Symbol and Exchange: |
CNR, Toronto ( and CNI, New York) |
| Currency: |
$ Canadian |
| Category: |
Mature with moderate growth potential |
| Contact: |
mark.wallace@cn.ca |
| Web-site: |
www.cn.ca |
| INCOME AND
PRICE / EARNINGS RATIO ANALYSIS |
| Latest four quarters annual sales $ millions: |
$7,897.0 |
| Latest four quarters annual earnings $ millions: |
$2,158.0 |
| P/E ratio based on latest four quarters earnings: |
12.2 |
| Latest four quarters annual earnings, adjusted, $
millions: |
$1,725.0 |
| BASIS OR SOURCE OF ADJUSTED EARNINGS: One time gains and losses
identified by management are removed for the adjusted earnings figure. |
| Quality of Earnings Measurement and Persistence: The reported
Earnings seem "real". But, the company notes that the depreciation
charges are insufficient to replace the equipment after inflation. This seems
to be the case given that capital expenditures are markedly higher than the
depreciation expense. Until 2005 the company was paying little cash taxes
which added to earnings quality, but cash taxes appear to equal accounting
taxes in 2006. Pension expenses have
been very much under-stated due to an unrealistic assumption of 8% return on
plan assets in 2004 (9% prior to 2003). The company reported just $22 million
pension expense while putting in $165 in 2004!. We calculate free cash flow closely approximates the net
income in 2005 adding back deferred taxes. But free cash flow lagged earnings
in 2006 as there was no deferred taxes. Overall, the quality of earnings is
probably good, but the quality has declined in 2006 versus prior years. |
| P/E ratio based on latest four quarters earnings, adjusted |
15.3 |
| Latest fiscal year annual earnings: |
$2,158.0 |
| P/E ratio based on latest fiscal year earnings: |
12.2 |
| Fiscal earnings adjusted: |
$1,725.0 |
| P/E ratio for fiscal earnings adjusted: |
15.3 |
| Latest four quarters profit as percent of sales |
21.8% |
| Dividend Yield: |
1.8% |
| Price / Sales Ratio |
3.34 |
| BALANCE SHEET
ITEMS |
| Price to (diluted) book value ratio: |
2.53 |
| Quality of Net Assets and Book Value Measurement: With little or
no intangible assets, the assets appear to be very strong. The value of the
equity overall appears to be conservatively stated. There is a large and
growing deferred income tax liability which will likely not be paid for many
years. (Witness the $250 million gain due to lower tax rates recognised in Q2 2006). The present
cash value of this liability is therefore likely much lower than the book
liability and this tends to add to the true economic value of equity and
create a stronger, higher quality balance sheet. |
| Number of Diluted common shares in millions: |
495.9 |
| Controlling Shareholder: none, partly due to a ridiculous 15%
ownership restriction imposed by government |
| Market Equity Capitalization (Value) $ millions: |
$25,717.4 |
| Percentage of assets supported by common equity: (remainder is
debt or other liabilities) |
43% |
| Interest-bearing debt as a percentage of common equity |
55% |
| Current assets / current liabilities: |
0.7 |
| Liquidity and capital structure: Very Good |
| RETURN ON
EQUITY AND ON MARKET VALUE |
| Latest four quarters adjusted (if applicable) net income return on average equity: |
17.2% |
| Latest fiscal year adjusted (if applicable) net income return on average equity: |
17.2% |
| Adjusted (if applicable) latest four
quarters return on market capitalization: |
6.7% |
| GROWTH RATIOS,
OUTLOOK and CALCULATED INTRINSIC VALUE PER SHARE |
| 5 years compounded growth in sales/share |
9.1% |
| Volatility of sales growth per share: |
stable with good growth
and recently accelerating |
| 5 years compounded growth in earnings/share |
26.4% |
| 5 years compounded growth in adjusted earnings per share |
14.5% |
| Volatility of earnings growth: |
strong steady growth but
recent flattening |
| Projected current year earnings $millions: |
not available |
| Projected price to earnings ratio: |
not available |
| Over the last five years, has this been a truly
excellent company exhibiting strong and steady growth in revenues per share
and in earnings per share? |
Yes |
| Expected growth in EPS based on adjusted fiscal Return on equity
times percent of earnings retained: |
12.7% |
| More conservative estimate of compounded growth in earnings per
share over the forecast period: |
7.0% |
| More optimistic estimate of compounded growth in earnings per
share over the forecast period: |
10.0% |
| OUTLOOK FOR BUSINESS:
2008 could see an earnings decline due to low forestry volumes and the
high Canadian dollar. Appears set for continued growth but earnings would
fall temporarily if the economy slumps.
The company projects 10 to 15% earnings per share growth longer term
but now indicates mid to high single digits for 2008 given the impacts of
higher Canadian dollar, low forestry volumes. With a possible recession
looming in North America there is a risk of an earnings decline in 2008. It
seems to us that they are well positioned for the long term as North America
continues to import ever-more goods from Asia. Therefore growth will be slow
in 2008 but resume at perhaps 7 to 10% thereafter. |
| Estimated present value per share: We calculate $56.82 if
earnings per share grow for 5 years at an average compounded 9% and the
shares can then be sold at a P/E of 15. And $68.83 if earnings per share grow
at a compounded 12% for 5 years and the shares can then be sold at a P/E of
16 (approximately the current P/E). Both estimates use an 8% required rate of
return. This is not a share price
prediction. |
| ADDITIONAL
COMMENTS |
| INDUSTRY ATTRACTIVENESS: (These comments reflect the industry
and the company's particular incumbent position within that industry
segment.) Michael Porter of Harvard argues that an attractive industry is one
where firms are somewhat protected from competition. This industry has very strong barriers to
entry in terms of rail rights of way (pass). Not subject to dependency on
powerful customers (pass). No dependency on powerful suppliers (pass), The
industry as a whole is subject to trucking as substitute product (fail),
Probably limited tendency to compete
excessively on the basis of price due to competitive advantage over trucks in
many cases but tempered by commodity nature of products and presence of fixed
cost structure (marginal pass). Overall, appear to be a somewhat attractive
industry |
| COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: Strong management with a focus on simple
fundamentals like moving the trains faster and minimizing investments in
assets. Acknowledged as the best managed railroad in North America. Appears
to have some "pricing power" as evidenced by the ability impose
fuel surcharges without affecting volumes. Presumably the tracks that they
own are an advantage because their are likely few or no other rail service
options available to many of their customers. (Although in some U.S. markets
they compete with barges on the Mississippi river). |
| RECENT EVENTS: Recently
completed two relatively smaller acquisitions and a small divestiture of a
European investment. |
| ACCOUNTING AND DISCLOSURE ISSUES: Uses U.S. GAAP. Generally
exceptionally good disclosure.
Excellent disclosure of freight moved (number of rail cars, ton-miles
etc.) and revenue sources and results for different freight types. However,
disclosure could be improved by including a 5 year summary in the annual
report and by including net income, adjusted net income and average number of
basic and fully diluted shares in the 5 year summary. There are some complexities involved in
understanding the pension liability. |
| COMMON SHARE STRUCTURE USED: Normal common shares, 1 vote per
share. |
| MANAGEMENT QUALITY: Excellent management. It appears that these
people definitely know how to run a railroad. Their focus on asset
utilization such as moving the trains faster (limiting idle time) seems very
logical. The excellent level of disclosure in the annual report is a sign of
a management that respects the shareholders. |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: Long-term incentive payouts were very
high in 2005 with two officers receiving U.S. $5 million and the CEO at U.S.
$17 million. But the in the prior year the CEO received only $1.6 million.
It's not clear to us if the big 2005 payouts should be treated as annual
amounts. The CEO salary and bonus in 2005 was generous but not excessive at
about $5 million. The other four big executives received only about $1
million which is really not that high for the top executives of such a large
company. Overall, given the size and profitability of this company, we
are not concerned about executive
compensation at this time. |
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS: A prestigious board with a number of
representatives from the investment community. A typical outside board member
has substantial shares (several $million worth) and this insures that their
interests are aligned with other shareholders. |
| Basis and Limitations of Analysis: The following applies to all
the companies rated. Conclusions are based largely on achieved earnings,
balance sheet strength, earnings growth trend and industry attractiveness. We
undertake a relatively detailed
analysis of the published financial statements including growth per
share trends and our general view of the industry attractiveness and the
company's growth prospects. Despite this diligence our analysis is subject to
limitations including the following examples. We have not met with management
or discussed the long term earnings growth prospects with management. We have
not reviewed all press releases. We typically have no special expertise or
knowledge of the industry. |
| DISCLAIMER: All stock ratings presented are "generic"
in nature and do not take into account the unique circumstances and risk
tolerance of any individual. The information presented is not a
recommendation for any individual to buy or sell any security. The authors
are not registered investment advisors and the information presented is not
to be considered investment advice to any individual. The reader should
consult a registered investment advisor or registered dealer prior to making
any investment decision. For ease of writing style the newsletter and
articles are often written in the first person. But, legally speaking, all
information and opinions are provided by InvestorsFriend Inc. and not by the
authors as individuals. InvestorsFriend Inc. itself does not have a position
in any of the indicated securities while the authors may have a position, as
disclosed in each report. The Authors' positions may subsequently change
without notice. |
| © Copyright:
InvestorsFriend Inc. 1999 - 2008
All rights to format and content are reserved. |
|
|